Schopenhauer Analysis

Joon Shin Ms. Love A. P. Language & account 17 February 2010 O. C. E. 1 Schopenhauers Assumption In terms of the human look, we argon currently ineffective to make definite statements as to how it functions and what factors affect its learning. Arthur Schopenhauer was a man who believed that to read bulks was to limit self-thinking. In turn, he believed that limiting self-thinking was to limit any chances of expanding champions intelligence. However, the influences written down in bound sheets of musical composition are no different from influences of the environment and the existence in general.Schopenhauer states that if a man does not trust to think, the safest plan is to take up a appropriate directly when he has a spare moment. Yet, it is interest to consider that to even assist intelligences on a page requires some make use of of the mind. sight do not inherently accept any idea and proposition thrown at them when recital a book. They take the idea and process it , whether they oddment up agreeing or disagreeing with the idea. It is this process of ratiocination that books shake up upon a mortal.Books do not tend to spiel easy, acceptable ideas to people books re bring out the area to philosophize, reason, and transgress oneself to the unique and infinite ideas of the populace. Schopenhauers biggest f all(prenominal)acy is his flavour that the human mind is a mindless(prenominal) machine, winning in information without any consideration and analysis of the information. However, the primary function of a book is to embrace a proofreader to analyze the ideas it has to arrive ater. If everyone were to accept all the various ideas circulating in our worlds library, then on that point would be no base of operations for debate and no conflicting ideas.Yet there are debates and there are arguments. The analysis of the ideas present in books lead to agreement, disagreement, and neutrality. Nonetheless, the reader rests upon a closing curtain after the process of reasoning and logic. Linda Elder and Richard capital of Minnesota once pointed out, One cannot be an educated person without consistently learning through reading. (Elder and Paul). This learning is from the process of constantly analyzing and processing ideas throughout the bound pages of information.As the mind is presented with new ideas, it strives to continue and build off of those ideas, adapting and changing its way of thinking constantly. A book can be thought of as a supplier of the raw and bare thoughts of the world. They do not specifically appeal to any of the five senses and thus, forces our minds to spread over by imagining those senses. A movie, on the separate hand, gives us visuals and sounds that feed specific emotions and thoughts to the audience. The audience sees and hears what the director specifically wants him/her to see and hear. in that location is no room for creativity.There is no room for individuality to seep in. In fa ct, most would argue that movies are growing to study detrimental effects upon people in society. The semipolitical cartoon Hollywood Trash by Jerry carbonated water displays a boy creation filled with the fight that Hollywood is dumping into him. This represents the state of mindlessness one adapts when absorbing the content in a movie. Because the mind is being spoon-fed ideas, it becomes reliant on the crutches that limit the senses and imagination. In a book, no direct image is being fed. Sounds are obsolete as well as physical touch.The only source of feed the reader has is the words on the pages. For example, when a reader sees the word blue, everything from the ocean to the color shirt they were wearing the other day fills his/her mind. Past memories, experiences, and events are all triggered by this word and culminate to form an expanse of images with no limits. This alone can stand as a reason why books force people to use their minds. It is at the level of sub conscio usness. To even comprehend words on a page, the mind is brought to pass water at full gear, providing the images, sounds, feel, smell, and tastes that bring the book to life.In retrospect, we as humans are influenced by everything in existence. Whether we formulate original ideas or evaluate the ideas of others is no matter in our path of achieving experience and information. Our current world today is filled with advertisements and a growing cosmos of electronics and artificial senses. That means that we are obtaining less use for our natural senses and imagination when we search for forms of entertainment. Schopenhauer says to find our natural influence and to enhance our thinking apply the world around us.Unfortunately, the world around us is quite possibly a thousand times worse than the very books he is trying to denounce. Our minds are filled with influences and daily trash from entertainment businesses such(prenominal) as Hollywood. They are being fed the knowledge of the world rather than being forced to lookup for it. So perhaps it is preferable to turn hindquarters to the detrimental books and seek to expand our intelligence there. aft(prenominal) all, the true learning readers inherit from books lies not in the actual information and ideas, but from the resulting process of reasoning and analysis of those ideas.We are not, as Schopenhauer expresses, stupid from learning. For it isnt the feed of information from books that rusts our intelligence on the contrary, it is our superpower to respond and expand upon our learning that solidifies our knowledge and builds a base for our intellect to prosper. BIBLIOGRAPHY Lolita in Tehran, Gatsby Paul, Richard, Elder, Linda, Critical sentiment and the Art of Close Reading (Part I). Journal of developmental Education 27 no. 2 36-7, 39 Wint. 2003 Seltzer, Jerry. Hollywood Trash. www. ParentsTV. org